“To maximize the likelihood that applications and patents will be found eligible under Section 101 by the USPTO and courts [after Recentive], applicants should carefully craft a narrative of a ... Law: Training Alone Is Not Enough: Lessons From 'Recentive' and USPTO AI Examples on Patent Eligible Machine-Learning Claims Training Alone Is Not Enough: Lessons From 'Recentive' and USPTO AI Examples on Patent Eligible Machine-Learning Claims JD Supra: Federal Circuit Patent Watch: Patents That Merely Claim Applying Machine Learning to a New Field of Use Are Not Patent Eligible Federal Circuit Patent Watch: Patents That Merely Claim Applying Machine Learning to a New Field of Use Are Not Patent Eligible The National Law Review: Not A Categorical Ban- Federal Circuit Narrowed Spectrum of Patent Eligible Machine Learning Claims Not A Categorical Ban- Federal Circuit Narrowed Spectrum of Patent Eligible Machine Learning Claims The National Law Review: Federal Circuit: Machine Learning Patents Ineligible in Recentive Analytics, Inc. v.

Understanding the Context

Fox Corp. Federal Circuit: Machine Learning Patents Ineligible in Recentive Analytics, Inc. v. Fox Corp.

Key Insights

“On appeal, the CAFC agreed that ‘the patents are directed to the abstract idea of using a generic machine learning technique in a particular environment, with no inventive concept’.” The U.S. Supreme ... Canva is a free-to-use online graphic design tool. Use it to create social media posts, presentations, posters, videos, logos and more. The use of can to ask or grant permission has been common since the 19th century and is well established, although some feel may is more appropriate in formal contexts.

Final Thoughts

May is relatively rare in negative constructions (mayn't is not common); cannot and can't are usual in such contexts.